Intergenerational Language Conflicts in Georgia: Tradition vs. Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23575783Keywords:
Intergenerational Communication; Sociolinguistic Change; Language Ideologies; Linguistic Tradition and Modernization; Cultural and Generational DynamicsAbstract
This paper explores generational slang and language-based misunderstandings in Georgia, focusing on how linguistic change contributes to social and cultural conflicts between generations. In recent decades, Georgia has experienced rapid political, technological, and cultural transformations, which have significantly influenced everyday language use. Younger generations increasingly adopt slang influenced by English, Russian, and digital communication, particularly through social media, music, and global popular culture. In contrast, older generations tend to value traditional Georgian linguistic norms and often perceive new slang as a threat to cultural identity and language purity. These differing linguistic practices frequently lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and tensions in family, educational, and professional settings. Slang expressions used by young people may be viewed as disrespectful or unclear by older speakers, while younger generations may see traditional language attitudes as restrictive or outdated. The paper argues that these language conflicts are not merely about vocabulary, but reflect deeper generational differences in values, identity, and worldviews. By examining examples of generational slang and everyday communication in Georgia, this study highlights how language functions as both a bridge and a barrier between generations. Understanding these dynamics can contribute to more effective intergenerational dialogue and promote greater linguistic tolerance in a rapidly changing society.
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 3–48). De Gruyter.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Ad-amson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Blackwell.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen & A. M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 1–25). Georgetown University Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Re-view of Anthropology, 23, 55–82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kristina Stoyanova (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.