Cultural Heritage in the Information Society

Authors

  • Marine Aroshidze Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23575588

Keywords:

cultural heritage; material and spiritual values; manipulation of public consciousness; linguistic markers of manipulation; ideological myths; cultural diplomacy

Abstract

The author of the article analyzes the integrative processes of linguistic and cultural globalization, which, in an increasingly technologically advanced world, are eroding the linguistic and cultural distinctiveness of ethnic groups. Cultural heritage has been transmitted from generation to generation for centuries, but digital communications have accelerated the transformation of cultural paradigms. The younger generation already lives in a different environment, which complicates intergenerational dialogue. The preservation of material and spiritual values created by ancestors is an essential condition for maintaining national identity. In this article, using selected examples from Georgian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Japanese cultures, we analyze different attitudes toward the ancestral cultural heritage, as manifested within the respective language and cultural policies of particular states: the preservation and protection of cultural heritage (often through armed resistance), the popu-larization of cultural customs and traditions, the “conservation” of cultural heritage as a result of policies of isolation, cultural diplomacy, and other approaches. In some cases, cultural heritage becomes an object of manipulation of public con-sciousness and a method of sociopolitical pressure. Cultural heritage is constructed or reconstructed through the creation and dissemination of ideological myths that produce an illusory reality. In today's multicultural information society, characterized by urbanization, the dominance of the English language, and the existence of a unified digital semiotic system, the preservation of national cultural heritage acquires particular importance for maintaining a unique ethnic cultural code. Our future depends on our attitude toward the past.

References

Aroshidze, M., & Aroshidze, N. (2026). Mechanisms of manipulation in the information society (linguistic aspect). Balkanistic Worlds, (2), 172–183.

Aroshidze, M., & Bolkvadze, L. (2024). Iap’onuri da kartuli k’ult’uris gzajvaredinze [At the crossroads of Japanese and Georgian cultures]. Aghmosavletmtsodneobis matsne [Bulletin of Oriental Studies], 7(1), 299–313.

Aroshidze, M., & Putkaradze, T. (2013). Bolgariya glazami gruzin [Bulgaria through the eyes of Georgians]. Universal.

Bell, D. (2004). Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: Opyt sotsi-al'nogo prognozirovaniya [The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting] (V. L. Inozemtsev, Ed.). Academia. (Original work published 1973)

Institute for Cultural Diplomacy. (n.d.). Cultural diplomacy.

https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/index.php?en_culturaldiplomacy

Masuda, Y. (1981). The information society as post-industrial society. World Future Society.

McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1968). War and peace in the global village: An inventory of some of the current spastic situations that could be eliminated by more feedforward. Bantam Books.

Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Sci-ence Quarterly, 119(2).

Putin, V. V. (2021, July 12). Ob istoricheskom edinstve russkikh i ukraintsev [On the historical unity of Russians and Ukrainians]. President of Russia.

http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181

Rybakov, B. A. (1982). Kievskaya Rus' i russkie knyazhestva XII–XIII vv. [Kievan Rus' and the Russian principalities of the 12th–13th centuries]. Nauka.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-22

How to Cite

Cultural Heritage in the Information Society. (2026). BALKANISTIC WORLDS, 2(3), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23575588