International Criminal Justice and Social Healing after Srebrenica: Reflections from Collective Memory

Автори

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20963351

Ключови думи :

Srebrenica genocide; Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH); transitional justice; collective memory

Абстракт

In the aftermath of the Srebrenica genocide, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) played a pivotal role in the development of international criminal law, delivering landmark judgments and establishing individual criminal responsibility for atrocity crimes. These judicial processes addressed cer-tain demands for accountability and, for some victims, contributed to a sense of justice. Yet legal adjudication was only one dimension of the post-genocide landscape. This paper examines the relationship between international criminal justice and community-led healing processes in post-Srebrenica Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). While the ICTY pursued accountability through formal legal mechanisms, affected communities simultaneously developed their own practices of remem-brance, mourning, and social repair, often outside institutional frameworks. Draw-ing on the Srebrenica case, the paper asks how these parallel processes have been positioned within collective memory, and which forms of justice and healing have occupied a more sustained role in shaping post-genocide social recovery. The paper argues that while ICTY judgments were crucial in establishing legal truth and combating denial, they were not sufficient to address the broader needs of social healing. Grassroots initiatives, commemorative practices, and everyday acts of remembrance played a more sustained role in shaping how justice and reconcilia-tion were experienced at the societal level. By comparing international criminal adjudication with local healing practices, the paper highlights the limits of legal justice and underscores the importance of community-driven processes in post-genocide societal reconciliation.

Литература (библиография)

Adams, R., & Halilovich, H. (2021). Mass myths to mass graves: Politicizing memory in Serbia as a prelude to genocide in Bosnia. In Nationalism and the Politicization of History in the Former Yugoslavia. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 279-296.

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, re-membrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press.

Bajramovic, Z. (2024). United Nations Resolution on Srebrenica Genocide, Solution or Dissolution of Bosnia And Herzegovina? Bezbednosni dijalozi, 15(2), 97-105.

Bakić, S. (2021). Srebrenica is not a Metaphor. The Significance of the Sre-brenica Memorial Center-Potočari for Understanding Genocide. Bosnian Studies: Journal for research of Bosnian thought and culture, 5(1), 54-64.

https://doi.org/10.47999/BOS.2021.5.1.54-64.

Cisneros Cristóbal, P. (2025). Srebrenica, treinta años después: genocidio, justicia transicional y legado jurídico del TPIY en el derecho internacional (No. ART-2025-147054). https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/165511.

Clark, J. N. (2014). International trials and reconciliation: Assessing the impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Routledge.

Demir, E. (2021). Examining the Role of Outreach Work in the International Criminal Justice System: The Case of ICTY. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 100-114.

Gavrankapetanović-Redžić, J. (2023). In the Shadow of Genocide: Mothers of Srebrenica and New Social Power. In Constructing Motherhood Identity Against Political Violence: Beyond Crying Mothers (pp. 129-144). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Hagan, J. (2019). Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting war crimes in the Hague Tribunal. University of Chicago Press.

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Ed. & Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

Halilovich, H. (2015). Long-distance mourning and synchronised memories in a global context: Commemorating Srebrenica in diaspora. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 35(3), 410-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2015.1073956.

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (n.d.). Outreach programme. https://www.icty.org/en/outreach/outreach-programme.

Leydesdorff, S. (2007). Stories from no land: The women of Srebrenica speak out. Human Rights Review, 8(3), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0005-7.

Luitjens, M., & Schoorel, E. G. M. (2022). Commemorating by marching: Memorialization and resistance practices of the Srebrenica genocide. Nationalities Papers, 50(6), 1107-1124. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.68.

Nettelfield, L. J., & Wagner, S. (2014). Srebrenica in the Aftermath of Gen-ocide. Cambridge University Press.

Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Repre-sentations, 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520.

Özoflu, M. A., & Besgul, B. (2023). A Critical Analysis of the Neoliberal State-Building in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Gap Between Aims and Achieve-ments. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 14(1), 131-150.

Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-T, Judgment (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugoslavia Mar. 24, 2016). https://www.icty.org/en/case/karadzic.

Prosecutor v. Karadžić, Case No. MICT-13-55-A, Appeals Judgment (Mech. for Int'l Crim. Tribunals Mar. 20, 2019).

https://www.icty.org/en/case/karadzic.

Prosecutor v. Krstić, Case No. IT-98-33-A, Appeals Judgment (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugoslavia Apr. 19, 2004).

https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/acjug/en/krs-aj040419e.pdf.

Prosecutor v. Krstić, Case No. IT-98-33-T, Judgment (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugoslavia Aug. 2, 2001). https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/18505-national-security-archive-international-criminal.

Prosecutor v. Mladić, Case No. IT-09-92-T, Judgment (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugoslavia Nov. 22, 2017). https://www.icty.org/en/case/mladic.

Prosecutor v. Mladić, Case No. MICT-13-56-A, Appeals Judgment (Mech. for Int'l Crim. Tribunals June 8, 2021). https://www.icty.org/en/case/mladic.

Prosecutor v. Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-A, Appeals Judgment (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugoslavia Jan. 30, 2015).

https://www.icty.org/x/cases/popovic/acjug/en/150130_judgement.pdf.

Prosecutor v. Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-T, Judgment (Int'l Crim. Trib. for the Former Yugoslavia June 10, 2010).

https://www.icty.org/x/cases/popovic/tjug/en/100610judgement.pdf.

Riding, J. (2020). Landscape after genocide. Cultural geographies, 27(2), 237-259

Schabas, W. A. (2000). Genocide in international law: The crimes of crimes. Cambridge University Press.

Schabas, W. A. (2001). Was genocide committed in Bosnia and Herze-govina? First judgments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugo-slavia. Fordham International Law Journal, 25(1), 23-53.

Schabas, W. A. (2003). International criminal law: Developments in the case law of the ICTY (Vol. 6). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Schabas, W. A. (2011). An introduction to the International Criminal Court (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Stover, E. (2011). The witnesses: War crimes and the promise of justice in The Hague. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Teitel, R. G. (2002). Transitional justice. Oxford University Press.

Teitel, R. G., & Vegh Weis, V. (2024). Transitional justice and human rights. Articles & Chapters. 1661.

https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters/1661.

Wagner, S. E. (2008). To know where he lies: DNA technology and the search for Srebrenica's missing. University of California Press.

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

2026-06-28

Брой

Раздел (Секция)

MEMORY, TRAUMA AND THE COMMUNIST PAST

Как да цитирате

International Criminal Justice and Social Healing after Srebrenica: Reflections from Collective Memory. (2026). BALKANISTIC WORLDS, 2(2), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20963351