Silenced Loyalties: Memory, Ambiguity and Intergenerational Resilience in a Romanian Family under Surveillance

Автори

  • Vlad Mitric-Ciupe Center for Historical and Architectural Studies, Bucharest Автор

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20962967

Ключови думи :

political repression; postmemory; intergenerational trauma; family ethics; Securitate archives; silent practices; microhistory

Абстракт

This article explores the intergenerational transmission of political trauma and morally ambivalent positioning within a Romanian family marked by repression, surveillance, and forced silence under communism. The Pușchilă family ‒ compris-ing three generations of architects ‒ serves as a microhistorical case study of how state violence, surveillance, and forced silence affected not only individuals but also family dynamics, identities, and vocational choices. The patriarch, Ioan Pușchilă, was imprisoned between 1949 and 1956, in the aftermath of the estab-lishment of the communist regime. His wife, Marcela, and later his son, Ion, were both formally approached and recorded as recruits in Securitate paperwork; however, in the archival record examined here, there are no documentary traces of sustained informant activity (e.g., informative notes, reports of meetings, opertional outputs) that would allow a substantiated assessment of the content or effects of such recruitment. This study refrains from moral judgment, focusing instead on the contexts of constraint, fear, and negotiation that shaped these ambivalent positions. Drawing on archival documents (criminal, surveillance and informant files from the CNSAS, and a long-form interview with Ana Pușchilă (daughter and keeper of the family memory), the article analyzes how silence, not speech, became the main vehicle of trauma and loyalty. It engages with theoretical frameworks such as postmemory (Marianne Hirsch), the ethics of care (Carol Gilligan), and microhistory (Ginzburg, Levi), proposing a multidimensional understanding of what it means to survive ‒ ethically and emotionally ‒ under authoritarian control. Ultimately, the Pușchilă case suggests that key moral and affective dispositions are transmitted less through explicit narration than through tacit communication rules, everyday risk-management practices, and patterned forms of family cohesion under surveillance.

Литература (библиография)

Abraham, N., & Torok, M. (1994). The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.

Agamben, G. (1999). Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Zone Books.

Das, V. (2006). Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. University of California Press.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Wom-en’s Development. Harvard University Press.

Ginzburg, C. (1989). Clues, Myths, and The Historical Method. Johns Hop-kins University Press.

Hirsch, M. (1997). Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Harvard University Press.

Levi, G. (1991). On Microhistory. In P. Burke (Ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing. Polity Press, pp. 93-113.

Margalit, A. (2002). The Ethics of Memory. Harvard University Press.

Mitric-Ciupe, V. (2013). Arhitecții români și detenția politică 1944–1964. Între destin concentraționar și vocație profesională. Editura Institutului Național pentru Studiul Totalitarismului.

Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Tran-scripts. Yale University Press.

Zugravu, C. (2005). Dictatura. O tragedie românească. Editura TipoMoldova.

Файлове за сваляне

Публикуван

2026-06-28

Брой

Раздел (Секция)

MEMORY, TRAUMA AND THE COMMUNIST PAST

Как да цитирате

Silenced Loyalties: Memory, Ambiguity and Intergenerational Resilience in a Romanian Family under Surveillance. (2026). BALKANISTIC WORLDS, 2(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20962967